What can we do about governmental and political dysfunction?

The Project on Political Reform investigates the sources of political and government dysfunction and identifies pragmatic solutions. PPR addresses topics such as legislative decision making, lobbying, political accountability, campaign laws and practices, structural incentives influencing candidate and office-holder behavior, and the relationships between governing institutions. PPR focuses primarily on local, state, and federal government in the United States but, at times, may also address governmental dysfunction in other Western democracies.

PPR is nonpartisan and strongly committed to thoughtful, evidence-based policymaking without regard to political party or ideology.

7 reasons to Come to Harris for a PhD in Political Economy

If you are currently considering a PhD in political science or political economy, or if you are advising students in this position, we encourage you to consider Harris Public Policy at the University of Chicago. In particular, if you want to study political institutions, political behavior, the political economy of democracies (including American politics), or the politics of the policymaking process, and if you want to develop skills in formal theory or design-based causal inference, this is the program for you. Here are 7 reasons.

PPR News & Events

Why Gridlock Rules Washington and How We Can Solve the Crisis:  A Conversation with Former Congressmen Patrick Murphy (R-FL18) and David Jolly (R-FL13)  

Moderated by David Axelrod.  May 23rd at 12:15 pm at Harris.  Co-sponsored by PPR and IOP.

Has Social Media Changed Democracy?

Social media has expanded the public square. More voices are being heard. But our democratic institutions are being severely tested … by fake news, echo chambers, hyper-partisanship, hate-speech, privacy breeches, laser-like message targeting, and even Russian meddling. The Project on Political Reform at Harris Public Policy, supported by a grant from the Democracy Fund, recently hosted a panel discussion entitled: Has Social Media Changed Democracy?  The panel, moderated by Washington Post national political correspondent Karen Tumulty, included top political digital professionals from both sides of the aisle.

Across the Aisle Dinner Series

The Across the Aisle Dinner Series is a way to bring students outside of their ideological comfort zones, pushing them to engage in challenging policy conversations that might otherwise be avoided. We typically recruit 6 liberals and 6 conservatives to participate in the discussion and share their honest and candid views on interesting and often controversial public policy issues. Dinner is always on us! You don't have to be an expert. You just need to be interested in politics and public policy. Recent topics have included:  guns, immigration reform, America's role in the world, and the proper role of government. Stay tuned for information on our next dinner.

Call for Ideas on Political Polarization

PPR is looking for innovative ideas for mitigating political polarization and/or its destructive effects.  Please submit your idea.  We will discuss the most interesting ideas at an upcoming conference on political polarization.  Remember … political viability is an important consideration.

Conference on Political Polarization

On May 10th - 12th, PPR will hosted a small bi-partisan conference of highly accomplished political practitioners and political scientists to discuss the scope and nature of political polarization in the United States and what, if anything, can or should be done to mitigate it or manage its consequences. 

Race and Place: A Conference on the Geographic and Racial Aspects of Political Polarization

This coming May 25th, PPR and the Department of Political Science will co-host a one-day conference on racial and geographic polarization and its political implications and manifestations.  Stay tuned for further information.

Conference on Electoral Reform

In June 2017, PPR and the Center for Survey Methodology (CSM) convened a remarkable two-day discussion on the current state of the electoral process. The participants included top political consultants from both major political parties and researchers from the University of Chicago, UCLA and Stanford University.  Political consultants are the principal custodians of the nation’s electoral system. They understand campaign processes and tactics better than almost anyone else and are constantly engaged in leveraging the system’s strength and exploiting its weaknesses. Yet their opinions and ideas are rarely solicited by either researchers or reformers. This conference sought to address this deficiency. In addition to PPR and CSM, Associated Press NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, and the Bipartisan Policy Center were co-organizers of this extraordinary conference.

Subscribe to our mailing list!

* indicates required